Designed for confidential brand evidence.
Every submission is protected by private storage, verified payments, authenticated access and an auditable manual-review workflow.
Your evidence is treated as confidential from the moment it arrives.
Every order, project, message, score and report is tied to your authenticated account and visible only to you and the reviewer assigned to your work. Uploaded files move directly into private storage and are never shared outside your organisation without permission.
Payment details are collected directly by Stripe. ReBrandMyAI never sees or stores raw card numbers.
The security model behind rebrandmyai.com.
Security is applied across identity, payments, files, projects, reviewer access, report release and operational monitoring.
Verified payments
Stripe collects payment data. A signed backend webhook, not a browser redirect, creates the paid order and project.
Private evidence storage
Files upload directly to private cloud storage through short-lived permissions, enter quarantine and are scanned before reviewer access.
Project-level access
Every request checks the authenticated user, organisation membership, role and permission to the specific project resource.
Encryption and audit history
Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. Important payment, access, score, QA and publication events are recorded.
Internal MFA
Reviewer, QA and administrator accounts require multi-factor authentication and shorter authenticated sessions.
Least privilege
Reviewers see assigned work. Finance, QA and administration permissions remain separate rather than sharing one powerful account.
Monitoring and recovery
Operational errors, suspicious activity, backup health and high-risk changes are monitored with tested recovery procedures.
Environment separation
Development, staging and production use separate data, credentials, storage, identities and payment modes.
We request access, not secrets.
Technical verification may require visibility into the implementation supporting an agreed experience. The operating model is invitation-based, least-privilege and time-bounded wherever the provider allows it.
Prefer controlled roles
Read-only repository collaboration, restricted cloud viewer roles, test-mode payment access and scoped log visibility are preferred over shared credentials.
Only what the experience needs
Technical access is limited to resources materially supporting the agreed experiences. Unrelated systems are not explored as part of the review.
Close access after the work
Access should be removed when the report and included recheck window no longer require it. Production secrets must never be pasted into normal intake or message fields.
Templates support consistency. Humans remain accountable for the judgment.
Each client-visible score, observation, evidence statement, commercial consequence and recommendation must be reviewed against the customer’s actual materials. Drafting, quality assurance and report publication are separate recorded stages.
Evidence-specific
Findings identify where the issue was observed and which submitted material supports the conclusion.
Quality controlled
Reports are checked for specificity, evidence, internal consistency, factual details and proportionate recommendations.
Versioned release
A published report is preserved. Corrections create a new version rather than silently changing what the client received.
Tell us if something does not look right.
If you believe you have identified a security or privacy concern, contact ReBrandMyAI with the affected page, the behaviour observed and enough detail for us to investigate without sending unnecessary sensitive information.
Report a concern →