Human + technical verification Question:

Does it workfor a real user?

We follow the critical experiences your users depend on—then trace the implementation underneath them to see whether the system behaves the way the business thinks it does.

Independent human walkthroughTechnical traceOne recheck included
Scroll to continue
The question behind the service
01 / HUMAN REALITY
02 / SYSTEM REALITY

Can a user successfully get from A to B—and does the system underneath behave the way it should?

OUTSIDE / HUMANWhat the customer actually experiences.
INSIDE / SYSTEMWhat the implementation actually does.
OUTSIDE → IN

Two viewpoints. One integrity finding.

We deliberately begin as a user, before the technical reviewer studies the implementation. That protects the independence of the human experience and gives the technical trace a real-world event to explain.

01 / HUMAN

Human Experience

A real person follows the agreed experience exactly as the intended user would on desktop and mobile.

02 / TRACE

Technical Trace

We inspect the implementation supporting that experience: interface state, requests, APIs, auth, integrations, data and logs where access permits.

03 / FINDING

Integrity Finding

Expected, actual and technical behaviour are reconciled into one evidence-backed determination.

04 / ACTION

Developer Brief

A concise technical brief can be handed to your developer, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Lovable, Replit or issue tracker.

05 / VERIFY

Recheck

You make the fix. We independently repeat the affected experience once within the recheck window.

01 / Outside

Use it like a customer.

HUMAN_PATH
  • Start from the agreed user state—not the code.
  • Follow the experience from beginning to end on desktop and mobile.
  • Record exact steps, timestamps, screenshots and outcomes.
  • Classify it as Verified, Working with Concerns, Failed or Unable to Verify.
  • Assess the impact on the actual user and business objective.
02 / Inside

Trace what happened underneath.

SYSTEM_TRACE
  • Review only the implementation supporting the agreed experiences.
  • Trace relevant front-end, API, authentication, integrations, data flow and logs.
  • Separate confirmed causes from strong indications and unknowns.
  • Flag material architectural or security concerns encountered in scope.
  • Turn the finding into a focused developer-ready action brief.
Scope without ambiguity

One experience has a beginningand a successful end.

We do not sell an undefined “app audit.” Every review is bounded by named user objectives so the client knows what is being verified and the technical reviewer knows where the trace stops.

“An experience is one defined user objective, performed by one user type, with an agreed starting point and an agreed successful outcome.”
EXP_01
Create an account

New visitor → verified account created and confirmation received.

EXP_02
Purchase a Growth plan

Pricing page → payment confirmed and entitlement applied.

EXP_03
Upload evidence

Client dashboard → file securely stored and visible to the intended reviewer.

NOT A SCOPE
“Test my whole app.”

If a request branches into materially different users, outcomes or systems, we define additional experiences or a custom scope.

Use it before something important

Verify before the stakes rise.

Experience Integrity is most valuable just before a real person, real money or a real reputation depends on the system behaving correctly.

01Product launch

Verify the critical path before customers encounter it at scale.

02Investor or client demo

Protect the experiences that must work when credibility is on the line.

03Customer handover

Independently verify what is being delivered before responsibility transfers.

04Paid acquisition

Check that signup, checkout and activation work before buying traffic.

05Enterprise pilot

Verify the workflows a prospective client will rely on during evaluation.

06Major release

Recheck critical experiences after a substantial AI-assisted rebuild.

A report you can act on

Not a bug list. An integrity record.

The client report combines the observed user outcome with technical verification and a prioritised path forward. The full evidence structure is private to the engagement.

CLIENT REPORT / PROTECTED DETAILCONDENSED PREVIEW

What the client receives.

HUMAN OUTCOMETECHNICAL VERIFICATIONPRIORITYRECHECK RECORD
EXPERIENCE OUTCOMEA clear disposition for each agreed experience, grounded in an independent walkthrough.
TECHNICAL VERIFICATIONAn evidence-backed trace of the system behaviour materially supporting that experience.
PRIVATE CLIENT DETAIL

Detailed evidence, step history, technical trace structure, confidence language and implementation notes are intentionally withheld from the public preview.

PRIORITISED ACTION

The client receives focused next-step direction appropriate to the finding.

RECHECK

The record is updated after the included independent recheck where applicable.

Launch pricing

One methodology. Three standard scopes.

All standard scopes include human walkthroughs, desktop and mobile, technical trace, evidence, developer briefs and one recheck cycle. We confirm testability and access before payment.

CORE INTEGRITY

3 experiences

$699 one review
  • 3 defined experiences
  • 5-business-day target
  • Human + technical verification
  • One recheck cycle
Scope Core
PLATFORM INTEGRITY

10 experiences

$1,999 one review
  • 10 defined experiences
  • 10-business-day target
  • Human + technical verification
  • One recheck cycle
Scope Platform
CUSTOM SCOPE

Complex systems

Quoted
  • More than 10 experiences
  • Multiple user roles/environments
  • Native or unusual infrastructure
  • Scope confirmed before payment
Request scope
ACCESS PRINCIPLE

We request access, not secrets.

Whenever possible, clients invite a restricted ReBrandMyAI reviewer rather than pasting credentials into a form. Access is limited to what is needed for the agreed experiences and recheck.

RepositoryRead-only collaborator
AWS / cloudRestricted viewer/debug role
StripeTest-mode/developer access
LogsRead-only access or export
DatabaseStaging/read-only if required
AI buildersAppropriate collaborator access
What it is

Independent experience verification.

  • Point-in-time testing of defined experiences
  • Human walkthrough plus technical trace
  • Evidence-backed findings and severity
  • Developer-ready actions
  • One independent recheck cycle
What it is not

Not a blanket guarantee.

  • Not proof the entire application works
  • Not a complete code audit
  • Not penetration or security certification
  • Not accessibility or compliance certification
  • Not load/stress or exhaustive cross-browser testing
Where it fits

Two independent questions after generation.

Experience Integrity does not replace the Full ReBrandMyAI Score. It extends the same human-judgment thesis into operational reality.

Full ReBrandMyAI Score™
Does it deserve trust?

Brand credibility, clarity, differentiation and commercial judgment across the established eight-dimension methodology.

Experience Integrity Review™
Does it actually work?

Independent human experience testing and technical verification across the critical paths the business depends on.

Before your customer finds it

Verify + Find & Fix fails.Make the experience real.

Tell us what your users need to accomplish. We confirm the scope, access and testability before you pay.

Scope my Experience Integrity Review™ →
Human walkthrough · Technical trace · One recheck included